Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49230

in Brooklyn, MichiganPopulation 10,077

51.53/ 100

Ranked #14,074 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #424 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #6 of 18 Jackson, MI ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

75.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

9.5 mi

in the top 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

0.97%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Brooklyn, Michigan (ZIP 49230) lands in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,074th) and the top 44% of Michigan (424th).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled colon screening lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and elder services registers in the top 16% nationally. Homeownership sits in the top 18% nationally, and modeled uninsured rests in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Unemployment is in the bottom 19% nationally, and modeled loneliness stands in the bottom 19% nationally. Against that, modeled radon settles in the top 8.6% nationally, distance to a nursing home lies in the top 12.1% nationally, and modeled pfas resides in the top 18% nationally. Modeled arsenic lands in the top 20% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 48158, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jackson, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.4%33.6–39.2
High blood pressure among adults41.9%38.7–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.0%11.1–13.0
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.8–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Depression among adults26.2%23.4–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.9–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%36.7–43.2
Obesity among adults38.0%33.3–42.9
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.5–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.6–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.9–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.2%78.7–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.9–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.1%71.5–78.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.7–73.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%72.8–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.7–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%12.2–15.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%22.6–28.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%32.8–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%17.7–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.9–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.6–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%12.0–14.7
Any disability among adults33.9%30.7–37.3
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.1–9.8
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.6–18.1
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%18.4–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.3–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.5–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Loneliness among adults29.6%26.3–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–643.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate89.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households73.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+30.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age55.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$83,458$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$270,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,197$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured