Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49261

in Napoleon, MichiganPopulation 199

49.36/ 100

Ranked #17,148 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #533 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #12 of 18 Jackson, MI ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

62%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.3%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

41.9%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

9.7 mi

in the top 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.6%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.7%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Napoleon, Michigan (ZIP 49261), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 47% nationally (17,148th) and the bottom 45% of Michigan (533rd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 0.5% nationally, home broadband subscription is at the national maximum, and floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and colon screening settles in the top 6.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled pfas registers in the top 7.2% nationally, and short sleep stands in the top 9.5% nationally. Fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 49230, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jackson, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.6%24.5–30.7
High blood pressure among adults33.5%29.7–37.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%4.8–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.2–9.5
Depression among adults29.2%25.6–33.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.6–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.6%29.1–36.3
Obesity among adults39.1%33.2–45.2
Stroke among adults3.0%2.5–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%6.0–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.4–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.1%67.9–74.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.2–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.1–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.3%69.3–77.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.9%60.4–67.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%72.1–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%15.6–22.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%13.2–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%20.7–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults41.9%36.6–47.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%16.3–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.4–22.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%11.9–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%13.6–18.9
Any disability among adults32.2%27.5–37.3
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.0–10.0
Mobility disability among adults13.0%10.6–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.8–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.7–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%19.8–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%11.4–18.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.9%10.8–17.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.5–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.6–9.6
Loneliness among adults32.7%28.3–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.8–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate84.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households22.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+12.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$91,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$208,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured