Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49245

in Homer, MichiganPopulation 4,547

42.80/ 100

Ranked #24,547 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #862 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 11.5%)

Ranked #10 of 12 Battle Creek, MI ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

42.6%

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.6 pCi/L

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

17.9%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Homer, Michigan (ZIP 49245), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 23% nationally (24,547th) and the bottom 11.5% of Michigan (862nd).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Working the other way, fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity lands in the top 10.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 16% nationally, and households without a vehicle settles in the top 17% nationally. Modeled radon stands in the top 18% nationally, and walkability is in the bottom 18% nationally. Childcare rests at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. Modeled independent living disability sits in the top 18% nationally.

In everyday language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 49068, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Battle Creek, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%29.8–36.4
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.7–43.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Depression among adults29.3%25.5–33.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.6–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.0–41.8
Obesity among adults42.6%35.9–49.0
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.0–18.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.9–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.2–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.5–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.1–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%62.5–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.7–67.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%67.4–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.5–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.8%17.1–22.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.7%25.3–34.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%27.6–38.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.0%20.1–26.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%17.8–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%14.8–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.9%15.8–20.1
Any disability among adults37.8%33.4–42.2
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–10.0
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.2–19.7
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.3–27.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.4–21.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.7%15.8–21.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.8–14.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.1–10.6
Loneliness among adults34.3%29.3–39.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.1–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6421.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)15.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle9.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription82.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+17.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age37.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$62,206$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$152,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$849$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 1.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.03 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured