Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49029

in Burlington, MichiganPopulation 1,415

51.05/ 100

Ranked #14,770 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #444 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #4 of 12 Battle Creek, MI ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

2.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

78.7%

in the bottom 14.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

28.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.6 pCi/L

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Burlington, Michigan (ZIP 49029) ranks in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,770th) and the top 46% of Michigan (444th).

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 11.7% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Homeownership settles in the top 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other side, walkability lands in the bottom 10.1% nationally, home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 14.7% nationally, and fatal road crashes rests in the top 15% nationally. Modeled radon lands in the top 17% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 16% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 49033, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Battle Creek, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.3%29.9–36.6
High blood pressure among adults39.2%35.2–43.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Depression among adults27.3%23.7–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.7–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.4–42.4
Obesity among adults40.6%34.0–47.0
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.4–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.8–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.3–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.4–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.7–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%66.0–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.2%65.8–72.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%69.1–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.8–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.3–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%21.1–29.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%27.1–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%15.9–21.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.9–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.7–16.3
Any disability among adults33.2%29.1–37.4
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.2
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Mobility disability among adults14.9%12.9–17.0
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%18.8–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.1–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.5–13.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.7
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.3–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription78.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate90.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households68.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+24.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age51.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$75,188$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$207,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,000$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured