Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46107

in Beech Grove, IndianaPopulation 13,020

44.71/ 100

Ranked #22,714 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #551 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #100 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (bottom 13.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

3.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.2 ppb

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

US91st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.5%

in the top 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

4.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Park land

3.5%

in the top 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US78th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Beech Grove, Indiana (ZIP 46107) ranks in the bottom 29% nationally (22,714th) and the bottom 27% of Indiana (551st).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: transit rests in the top 9.5% nationally, and elder services stands in the top 9.8% nationally. Walkability lies in the top 10.1% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes sits in the bottom 18% nationally. Set against that, lead in tap water is in the top 9.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking resides in the top 14.9% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 18% nationally. PFAS in drinking water rests in the top 20% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 46237, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $56,799 predicts 77.8 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,613 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.8 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.9 years — 2.5 years below them.

    Ranked #1,930 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%27.4–31.4
High blood pressure among adults39.2%36.9–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.7–9.1
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.9–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Depression among adults29.0%26.6–31.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%12.0–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%36.3–41.0
Obesity among adults37.7%34.6–41.1
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.5%16.9–22.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.9–11.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%74.7–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%75.9–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.1%82.4–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%61.6–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%55.2–60.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%70.9–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%16.5–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%16.0–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%23.1–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%34.6–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.7%20.5–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.4–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%14.1–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.3–18.9
Any disability among adults33.7%30.8–36.6
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Mobility disability among adults16.3%14.6–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%21.0–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.1–19.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.6–13.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.7–13.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Loneliness among adults34.8%32.2–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate67.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households40.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age36.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$56,799$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$181,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,120$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured