Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49047

in Dowagiac, MichiganPopulation 14,858

46.14/ 100

Ranked #21,186 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #744 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #21 of 27 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.28 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

Dowagiac, Michigan (ZIP 49047), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 34% nationally (21,186th) and the bottom 24% of Michigan (744th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: grocery registers in the top 4.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 10.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Elder services lies in the top 21% nationally. By contrast, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Unemployment settles in the top 17% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 21% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 49031, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.4%29.2–35.5
High blood pressure among adults38.8%34.9–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.6–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%9.3–11.4
Depression among adults27.9%24.2–31.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.9–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%33.4–41.4
Obesity among adults37.3%30.1–44.9
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%12.0–17.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%7.3–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.8–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.6–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.3–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.5%62.7–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.4%59.9–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%67.4–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.4–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%15.4–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%24.4–33.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%29.5–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.9%20.3–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.1–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.5–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%15.3–18.8
Any disability among adults36.3%32.0–40.5
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.5–11.6
Mobility disability among adults16.9%15.0–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.3–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.3–20.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.4–20.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%11.2–15.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
Loneliness among adults33.2%27.8–38.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.4–11.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6415.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)10.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)7.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription88.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate76.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households56.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age42.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$62,963$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$181,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$858$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.48 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured