Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46637

in South Bend, IndianaPopulation 16,200

53.55/ 100

Ranked #11,298 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #118 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #4 of 27 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI ZIPs (top 14.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

88.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.3 mi

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.31 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

72.6%

in the top 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Park land

7.4%

in the top 14.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

32.6%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US27th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 46637, one of several in South Bend, Indiana, in overall standing, comes out in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,298th) and the top 16% of Indiana (118th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: pharmacy registers in the top 12.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Park land lies in the top 14.6% nationally, and walkability registers in the top 16% nationally. Against that, modeled pfas is in the top 0.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 8.7% nationally, and lead in tap water is in the top 11.0% nationally. Modeled arsenic lies in the top 11.7% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 13.2% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 46530, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 16.8; chronic-disease standing 68.0 — 51 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,505 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.6%24.2–29.2
High blood pressure among adults35.2%32.2–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Depression among adults27.0%24.1–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%10.0–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%34.0–40.6
Obesity among adults32.6%28.3–37.4
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.3–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.3–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.8–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%77.1–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.4–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.8%64.7–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%60.0–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%69.1–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.3–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%11.0–14.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%20.3–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%32.0–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%16.1–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.1–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.8–16.2
Any disability among adults30.5%27.2–34.1
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.9–14.1
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.4%21.4–27.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.4–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Loneliness among adults34.5%30.5–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription88.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate68.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population10.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households59.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+19.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$71,462$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$207,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,163$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured