Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48179

in South Rockwood, MichiganPopulation 3,209

51.08/ 100

Ranked #14,721 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #443 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #11 of 17 Monroe, MI ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

25.7%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

56.6%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.5%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

0.59%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

71.9%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

South Rockwood, Michigan (ZIP 48179), overall, ranks in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,721st) and the top 46% of Michigan (443rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: park land registers in the top 5.5% nationally, modeled colon screening resides in the top 8.9% nationally, and modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 14.8% nationally. Modeled tooth loss is in the bottom 16% nationally, and households without a vehicle sits in the bottom 18% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas lands in the top 9.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 14.3% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 17% nationally. Physicians rests at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity registers in the top 19% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 48134, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Monroe, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.5–37.1
High blood pressure among adults38.4%34.7–42.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Depression among adults26.7%23.4–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.1–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%35.0–43.0
Obesity among adults40.9%35.0–47.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%6.9–10.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.1–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.3–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.8–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.5–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%68.3–76.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.9%68.8–74.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%64.6–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.5–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.2–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%21.3–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.5%29.7–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.9–22.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.9–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.2–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.6–16.2
Any disability among adults32.8%28.9–37.2
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.3–17.5
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.6–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.2–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.5–13.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.3–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–8.0
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.0–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–642.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription87.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate77.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households62.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age42.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$77,095$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$232,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,350$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 1.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured