Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48875

in Portland, MichiganPopulation 11,400

56.13/ 100

Ranked #8,136 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #230 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #29 of 79 Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

72.4%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

79.8%

in the top 24% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US76th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Portland, Michigan (ZIP 48875) ranks in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,136th) and the top 24% of Michigan (230th).

continue reading

The profile opens on a set of genuinely favorable readings: mental-health providers resides in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening lands in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled tooth loss registers in the bottom 10.1% nationally, and elder services sits in the top 16% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the bottom 17% nationally, fair or poor health is in the bottom 17% nationally, and uninsured stands in the bottom 9.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic settles in the top 10.7% nationally, and distance to a community health center lies in the top 14.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 48822, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.6–32.1
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.0–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Depression among adults27.4%23.8–31.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.6–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.1%30.2–38.3
Obesity among adults37.4%30.4–44.7
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%5.9–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.4–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.2%72.0–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.2–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.5–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.4%67.9–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.4%70.4–76.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%72.2–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.8–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.2%11.4–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.9%17.4–24.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%27.0–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%13.6–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.5–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.2–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.8–15.0
Any disability among adults27.8%24.0–31.8
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Mobility disability among adults11.5%10.0–13.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%17.9–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.8–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.7–10.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–6.9
Loneliness among adults31.7%26.8–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate78.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households56.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age38.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$94,216$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$227,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,055$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.57 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured