Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48841

in Henderson, MichiganPopulation 729

48.56/ 100

Ranked #18,234 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #600 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

56.7%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.0%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.62%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Henderson, Michigan (ZIP 48841), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 43% nationally (18,234th) and the bottom 38% of Michigan (600th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure lands in the bottom 14.7% nationally, and modeled transportation noise resides in the bottom 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled arsenic settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and energy burden stands in the top 9.7% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Walkability rests in the bottom 18% nationally.

In everyday language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 48831, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%29.2–35.1
High blood pressure among adults37.8%34.3–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.9–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.6–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.5
Depression among adults27.9%24.7–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%33.6–40.7
Obesity among adults37.8%31.8–43.9
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.8–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.4–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%75.2–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.4–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.2–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.6%65.4–73.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%64.6–70.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.7–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%14.0–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.9–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%23.0–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%30.7–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%18.5–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.9–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%14.2–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.9–17.3
Any disability among adults33.2%29.6–37.1
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.3–10.3
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.8–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.9–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.9–16.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.1–15.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%9.0–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Loneliness among adults33.0%28.8–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)17.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate84.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households71.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+19.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age52.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$60,156$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$164,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$915$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured