Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22102

in Mc Lean, VirginiaPopulation 29,184

74.43/ 100

Ranked #71 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.3%)

Ranked #5 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 0.6%)

Ranked #11 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 3.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

20.7%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$153,949

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.4%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.6%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.1%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.3%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.2%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.1%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.9%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

0.94%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 22102, one of several in Mc Lean, Virginia sits in the top 0.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (71st) and the top 0.6% of Virginia (5th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled obesity settles in the bottom 1.2% nationally, household income stands in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, transportation sits in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and energy burden settles in the bottom 0.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 20854, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. This ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 1.0%

8%

Disability

in the top 1.0%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.8 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $153,949 predicts 81.8 years — 2.0 years above.

    Ranked #952 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 32.0; chronic-disease standing 97.6 (top 10%) — 66 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,980 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults18.6%16.6–20.7
High blood pressure among adults25.2%22.6–28.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.3–7.5
Current asthma among adults8.6%7.7–9.7
Coronary heart disease among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
Depression among adults18.2%15.9–20.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.2%7.1–9.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.2–38.7
Obesity among adults20.7%17.4–24.4
Stroke among adults1.9%1.8–2.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.3%3.4–5.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.2–5.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%70.9–76.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%74.0–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults89.6%88.2–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%65.8–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults77.6%75.3–79.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.7%76.6–86.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.6–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.3%13.1–17.8
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%29.2–36.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.3%8.9–11.7
Frequent mental distress among adults11.3%10.1–12.8
Frequent physical distress among adults8.3%7.4–9.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.2
Any disability among adults18.9%16.5–21.4
Hearing disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Independent living disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Mobility disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Self-care disability among adults1.7%1.5–1.9
Vision disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%17.1–22.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.7%3.1–4.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Loneliness among adults31.9%28.0–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.4%3.0–4.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–645.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)1.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)81.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle6.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription96.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate48.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population37.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households49.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$153,949$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$955,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$2,497$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.8 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 83.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured