Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48302

in Bloomfield Hills, MichiganPopulation 17,505

70.19/ 100

Ranked #555 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.8%)

Ranked #13 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 1.4%)

Ranked #13 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 6.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$178,103

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

4.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.6%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.2%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.6%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

74%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.1%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.8%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 48302, one of several in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan sits in the top 1.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (555th) and the top 1.4% of Michigan (13th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: household income sits in the top 1.8% nationally, physicians registers in the top 1.5% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Modeled transportation resides in the bottom 2.2% nationally, cognitive disability lies in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and utility shutoff is in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled pfas sits in the top 3.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 48301, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.9%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.6 ± 1.7 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.0 years — 3.6 years above them.

    Ranked #513 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.3%24.1–28.5
High blood pressure among adults35.4%32.8–38.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.8–11.5
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.5–5.8
Depression among adults18.9%16.8–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%34.3–39.8
Obesity among adults27.4%24.2–30.6
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.0%4.9–7.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.5%3.0–4.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%79.5–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.6%81.5–85.6
Cholesterol screening among adults92.4%91.4–93.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.6%70.6–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults78.2%76.1–80.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%74.1–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%12.3–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.6%6.6–8.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.4%14.3–18.6
Short sleep duration among adults28.1%25.3–31.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
Frequent mental distress among adults12.0%10.8–13.4
Frequent physical distress among adults10.0%9.0–11.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Any disability among adults21.1%18.9–23.4
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Independent living disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Mobility disability among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.2–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.2%15.9–20.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.4–6.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Loneliness among adults27.8%24.6–31.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)2.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)77.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription95.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate86.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population19.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households56.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+27.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age46.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$178,103$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$661,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,966$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured