Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48342

in Pontiac, MichiganPopulation 17,564

32.08/ 100

Ranked #30,293 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.6%)

Ranked #947 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 2.7%)

Ranked #198 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 8.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

8.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.7%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.5%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

31.4%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

25.3%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

43.8%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

31.5%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

21.4%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

728 units

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 48342, one of several in Pontiac, Michigan lands in the bottom 5.6% nationally (30,293rd) and the bottom 2.7% of Michigan (947th).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled self-care disability rests in the top 1.6% nationally, vision disability registers in the top 2.4% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the top 2.4% nationally, utility shutoff is in the top 0.7% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the top 1.6% nationally. On the better side, subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 2.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. On the overall standing, ZIP 48326, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 70.2 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $35,253 predicts 76.0 years — 5.8 years below.

    Ranked #5,712 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 70.2 ± 1.4 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.6 years — 9.4 years below them.

    Ranked #3,682 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%24.9–29.1
High blood pressure among adults45.1%42.4–47.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Current asthma among adults13.7%12.4–15.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.6–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.5–12.6
Depression among adults21.9%19.5–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.8%17.1–20.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%30.5–35.5
Obesity among adults47.2%43.2–51.1
Stroke among adults5.7%5.3–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.4%27.4–35.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.0%14.0–18.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.9–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.6–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%81.0–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.9%54.1–61.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.9%44.0–50.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.4%64.7–75.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%10.4–14.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.3%21.8–26.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.1%35.6–42.5
Short sleep duration among adults44.3%40.7–48.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.7%31.9–37.5
Frequent mental distress among adults22.3%20.2–24.2
Frequent physical distress among adults18.7%17.0–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.0%20.0–24.1
Any disability among adults40.1%36.8–43.2
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Independent living disability among adults15.5%14.1–17.0
Mobility disability among adults21.9%20.0–23.8
Self-care disability among adults8.8%8.2–9.5
Vision disability among adults11.7%10.8–12.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.8%29.2–36.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults43.8%40.0–47.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults45.4%41.7–49.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.5%28.2–34.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults21.4%19.2–23.7
Loneliness among adults39.4%35.4–43.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults25.3%22.6–28.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6417.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)24.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)13.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle20.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription83.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)44.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate40.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population11.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households27.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+10.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$35,253$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$101,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$999$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth70.2 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 70.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured