Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48326

in Auburn Hills, MichiganPopulation 24,514

62.05/ 100

Ranked #3,500 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.0%)

Ranked #81 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 8.4%)

Ranked #53 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

77.6%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

51.7%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.8%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.5%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.9%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.2%

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.2%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 48326, one of several in Auburn Hills, Michigan lands in the top 11.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,500th) and the top 8.4% of Michigan (81st).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and mobility disability lies in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 11.5% nationally, mental-health providers sits in the top 12.0% nationally, and modeled tooth loss rests in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Against that, modeled pfas is in the top 2.4% nationally, homeownership stands in the bottom 10.0% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise settles in the top 11.8% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 48098, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 23.3; chronic-disease standing 89.4 — 66 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,031 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.2%19.4–23.0
High blood pressure among adults31.0%28.6–33.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.4–7.6
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.6–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Depression among adults21.2%18.8–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%8.2–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.0%28.6–33.4
Obesity among adults30.8%27.4–34.2
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.9%5.6–8.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.6–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.7%72.3–77.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%76.0–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.2–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.1%67.9–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.1%67.5–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%71.6–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.9–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.9–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.1%17.7–22.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.0%29.9–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.7–17.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.6–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%11.2–14.1
Any disability among adults23.8%21.4–26.4
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Mobility disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.6–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.0–16.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.7–12.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.3–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Loneliness among adults33.4%29.9–37.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–647.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)49.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate51.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population18.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households51.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+15.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$85,190$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$245,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,477$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured