Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48314

in Sterling Heights, MichiganPopulation 21,803

54.45/ 100

Ranked #10,128 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #288 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #112 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.5%

in the top 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 48314, one of several in Sterling Heights, Michigan, overall, ranks in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,128th) and the top 30% of Michigan (288th).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, physicians stands in the top 7.6% nationally, and distance to an emergency room rests in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Walkability registers in the top 14.9% nationally, dental providers resides in the top 16% nationally, and modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 18% nationally. Working the other way, distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 11.1% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 11.7% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 13.0% nationally, and households without a vehicle lies in the top 17% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 48085, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%27.5–32.9
High blood pressure among adults37.2%33.9–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.1–9.1
Depression among adults25.4%22.5–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.9–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%35.4–42.0
Obesity among adults34.7%30.4–39.3
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.9%7.3–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%5.3–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.2–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%79.1–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.4–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%66.2–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.7%66.9–72.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%72.9–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.9–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%12.1–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%22.3–29.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%31.5–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%16.9–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.2–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.3–15.6
Any disability among adults31.5%28.2–35.2
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.7–8.4
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.1–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.5–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.9–15.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.4–14.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.8–11.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Loneliness among adults32.7%28.6–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription93.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate75.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population24.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households63.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+24.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age47.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$85,889$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$331,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,476$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured