Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01542

in Rochdale, MassachusettsPopulation 2,615

56.00/ 100

Ranked #8,275 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #388 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #56 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

85%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

38.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.2%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.3%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.3%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.7 pCi/L

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

85.4%

in the bottom 32% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US32nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Rochdale, Massachusetts (ZIP 01542), by its composite score, sits in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,275th) and the bottom 26% of Massachusetts (388th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled mammography lies in the top 0.6% nationally, and fatal road crashes rests at the national minimum. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Poverty is in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening stands in the top 10.2% nationally, and uninsured registers in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled arsenic settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 7.0% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Next to the surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 01501, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%27.9–33.2
High blood pressure among adults35.9%32.9–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.4
Current asthma among adults12.2%11.0–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%5.9–8.1
Depression among adults25.5%22.9–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%35.0–41.0
Obesity among adults32.1%27.9–36.4
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%6.9–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.3%3.4–5.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%75.0–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.6%80.2–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults91.3%90.0–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.1%68.5–75.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.7–73.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years85.0%80.3–88.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%15.3–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%10.4–14.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.5–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.0%30.2–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.7%14.4–19.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.2–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%11.9–15.4
Any disability among adults28.7%25.3–32.1
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.8%10.9–14.8
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%20.8–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.5–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–13.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.6–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.3
Loneliness among adults33.2%29.8–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription85.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate84.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households61.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+34.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age58.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$96,111$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$405,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,474$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.9978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.99 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured