Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48309

in Rochester Hills, MichiganPopulation 30,685

65.56/ 100

Ranked #1,786 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.6%)

Ranked #39 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 4.1%)

Ranked #30 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 14.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

82.5%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.7%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.1%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

5.1%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.5%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$121,007

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.9%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 48309, one of several in Rochester Hills, Michigan, overall, ranks in the top 5.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,786th) and the top 4.1% of Michigan (39th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 4.9% nationally, colon screening rests in the top 4.6% nationally, and tooth loss registers in the bottom 2.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the bottom 7.2% nationally, modeled energy burden settles in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and household income is in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and diabetes lands in the bottom 8.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas lies in the top 1.4% nationally, and expected annual loss stands in the top 9.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 48085, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 33.6; chronic-disease standing 85.3 — 52 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,557 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.7%21.7–25.7
High blood pressure among adults32.4%29.8–34.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Depression among adults21.7%19.3–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.3%31.7–36.8
Obesity among adults28.8%25.6–32.1
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.1%4.2–6.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.3–6.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.5–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%78.9–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.6–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.1%71.1–77.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults77.5%75.3–79.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%72.9–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%13.1–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.6%8.3–11.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.6%16.4–20.9
Short sleep duration among adults28.7%25.8–31.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.5%13.0–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%14.0–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%11.0–13.6
Any disability among adults24.2%21.9–26.6
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Mobility disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.4–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.6–13.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.5–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Loneliness among adults30.9%27.5–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–645.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)64.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate80.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population18.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households53.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age42.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$121,007$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$424,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,686$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured