Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95003

in Aptos, CaliforniaPopulation 24,951

65.30/ 100

Ranked #1,889 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranked #254 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 14.8%)

Ranked #2 of 17 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA ZIPs (top 11.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

45.1 per million

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$148,412

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.4%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Park land

36.9%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

8.1 days/year

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.4%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Aptos, California (ZIP 95003) lands in the top 5.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,889th) and the top 14.8% of California (254th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: household income is in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled obesity settles in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Park land resides in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 5.3% nationally, food insecurity stands in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and energy burden lies in the bottom 3.7% nationally. Set against that, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 1.5% nationally, expected annual loss sits in the top 3.1% nationally, and disaster risk is in the top 5.0% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 95033, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 45.1 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 81.5 ± 1.6 years.

    Ranked #287 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.5%22.5–28.5
High blood pressure among adults33.2%29.5–36.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Depression among adults22.3%19.1–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.5–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.0–42.3
Obesity among adults24.4%19.2–29.9
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.8%4.6–7.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.7%4.1–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%72.4–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%72.0–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.2–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%66.7–75.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.0%71.0–76.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.4%73.9–85.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.8–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.4%7.1–9.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.6%13.7–19.5
Short sleep duration among adults29.7%24.4–35.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.8%13.7–17.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.4%12.7–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.6–13.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.0
Any disability among adults25.8%22.4–29.2
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.6–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Mobility disability among adults12.1%10.5–13.8
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.5–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.0–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription96.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate70.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population9.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households60.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+24.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age48.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$148,412$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$1,198,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$2,731$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured