Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48190

in Whittaker, MichiganPopulation 76

59.43/ 100

Ranked #5,262 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #133 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 13.7%)

Ranked #10 of 15 Ann Arbor, MI ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

26.6%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

75.2%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.1%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

11.2%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.7%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Whittaker, Michigan (ZIP 48190) ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,262nd) and the top 13.7% of Michigan (133rd).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and short sleep lands in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Poverty registers at the national minimum, and homeownership sits at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription rests at the national maximum. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled pfas settles in the top 3.0% nationally, loud transportation noise lies in the top 6.9% nationally, and transportation noise resides in the top 7.1% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 48191, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Ann Arbor, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.4–29.5
High blood pressure among adults30.9%28.2–33.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.4–8.1
Depression among adults29.0%25.9–32.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.9%29.0–34.7
Obesity among adults28.8%24.9–32.8
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.2%5.0–7.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%3.8–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%75.0–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%75.3–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%86.9–91.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.7%70.3–77.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.1%73.7–78.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.3%68.4–79.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%15.0–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%9.1–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.8%14.3–21.4
Short sleep duration among adults26.6%23.5–29.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.2%11.5–17.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.4–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.6–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%10.6–15.5
Any disability among adults26.3%22.4–30.4
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Independent living disability among adults7.0%5.7–8.4
Mobility disability among adults10.8%8.9–12.9
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.3–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%2.9–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.5–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.1–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.4%5.9–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.3–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.5–6.8
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.5–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.3–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)10.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population10.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+59.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age69.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$76,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$218,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured