Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47974

in Perrysville, IndianaPopulation 1,441

42.11/ 100

Ranked #25,126 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #647 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 14.6%)

Ranked #32 of 39 Terre Haute, IN ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

24.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.4%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

12.8%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.6%

in the top 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

43.4%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.1%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

15.7%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

61.1%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

18.6%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US75th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

Perrysville, Indiana (ZIP 47974), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 22% nationally (25,126th) and the bottom 14.6% of Indiana (647th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 10.1% nationally, and modeled pfas is in the bottom 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled arsenic stands in the top 4.7% nationally, crowded housing registers in the top 9.8% nationally, and modeled radon settles in the top 15% nationally. Modeled obesity sits in the top 15% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden rests in the top 14.2% nationally, and high cholesterol resides in the top 14.7% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 47928, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Terre Haute, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.0%32.3–39.9
High blood pressure among adults43.4%39.1–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%9.7–13.0
Depression among adults26.1%22.4–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.7%13.6–17.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.2%37.7–46.9
Obesity among adults41.5%33.7–49.7
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.9%15.6–22.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.0–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.2–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.3–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.9–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.1%55.7–66.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.6%52.7–60.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%64.4–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.0–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.0%17.0–23.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%24.4–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%30.3–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%21.3–28.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.1–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%14.6–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.5–19.0
Any disability among adults36.8%31.9–41.7
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.5
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.3–11.1
Mobility disability among adults18.6%16.0–21.5
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.1–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.5–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%12.8–18.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.9–11.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.8–9.1
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.6–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–644.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription82.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate73.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age42.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$89,962$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$123,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$842$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 1.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.59 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured