Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47868

in Poland, IndianaPopulation 2,666

42.19/ 100

Ranked #25,052 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #641 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #14 of 15 Bloomington, IN ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.36 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70.6%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

95.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

75.1%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.4%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.26%

in the bottom 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.1%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

43.3%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.5%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

15.7%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Poland, Indiana (ZIP 47868), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 22% nationally (25,052nd) and the bottom 15% of Indiana (641st).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: elder services registers in the top 3.7% nationally, modeled tree cover lands in the top 8.9% nationally, and fiber broadband resides in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 11.5% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other hand, home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 10.1% nationally, and modeled obesity is in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 10.2% nationally, and poverty sits in the top 13.8% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

In everyday language, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 46120, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bloomington, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 63.4; chronic-disease standing 12.5 — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,427 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.2%31.9–38.5
High blood pressure among adults43.3%39.4–47.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%9.7–12.8
Depression among adults26.8%23.4–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.7%13.8–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.1%39.0–47.1
Obesity among adults43.4%36.3–50.5
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.4%17.1–24.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.7–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.7–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%78.0–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.3–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.2%60.8–69.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.8%49.4–56.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%65.8–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.8–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.0%17.0–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.3%23.8–32.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%32.5–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%21.0–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.2–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%14.8–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.2–18.2
Any disability among adults35.9%31.5–40.0
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.6
Mobility disability among adults18.0%15.5–20.6
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.4%20.1–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.7–17.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.3–12.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.8–8.8
Loneliness among adults31.7%27.3–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–644.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)11.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)4.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription75.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate78.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households50.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age46.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$51,409$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$159,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$939$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.71 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured