ZIP code
47863
in New Goshen, IndianaPopulation 207
51.90/ 100
Ranked #13,583 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)
Ranked #180 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 24%)
Ranked #5 of 39 Terre Haute, IN ZIPs (top 12.9%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Walkability
290 intersections/sq mi
in the top 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
73.9%
in the top 5.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, New Goshen, Indiana (ZIP 47863) places in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,583rd) and the top 24% of Indiana (180th).
The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: walkability rests in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and homeownership lands at the national maximum. Floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening settles in the top 5.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled tree cover lies at the national minimum. Fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
Beside the areas that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 47880, about 2.4 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Terre Haute, IN metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 70%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 67%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 65%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 70%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 48%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 57%
14%
Disability
healthier than 53%
7%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 17%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 35%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 73%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 76%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 78%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 68%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 50%
7%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 26%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 31%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 85%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 93%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 74%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 70%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 93%
11%
Disability
healthier than 67%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 78%
5%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 22%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
47885
Indianashares a border
Score 43.72
Closest healthier
47880
Indianaabout 2.4 mi away
Score 53.54
Similar health profile
49079
Michigan99% similar profile
Score 51.66
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 28.7% | 25.6–31.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 35.1% | 31.5–38.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.4% | 8.3–10.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.2% | 9.8–12.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.9% | 6.7–9.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.5% | 6.7–10.7 |
| Depression among adults | 26.5% | 22.8–30.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.0% | 10.1–14.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.4% | 34.6–42.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 35.6% | 29.6–41.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.6% | 3.0–4.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 15.2% | 12.3–18.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.1% | 4.8–10.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.0% | 76.7–81.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.1% | 75.4–82.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.4% | 79.6–86.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.9% | 69.3–78.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.6% | 61.1–67.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.6% | 68.6–81.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.6% | 13.6–19.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.6% | 10.3–17.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 22.1% | 17.4–27.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.2% | 30.0–40.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.7% | 15.8–24.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.7% | 15.5–21.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.3% | 11.1–16.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.1% | 12.8–20.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 32.6% | 27.2–38.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.5% | 7.3–10.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.4% | 6.7–10.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 13.8% | 11.0–16.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.4% | 2.7–4.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.7–5.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 21.1% | 17.1–25.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.8% | 8.5–15.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 6.4% | 4.5–8.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 6.5–11.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.9% | 5.4–8.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.0% | 29.9–40.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.0% | 4.7–7.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.1% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 8.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 8.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 29.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | 76.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 11.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756 |
| Population 65+ | 9.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767 |
| Median age | 39.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $925 ($704–$1,261) n=640 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.7 yr ± 1.47 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.47 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured