Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47881

in Staunton, IndianaPopulation 266

49.09/ 100

Ranked #17,540 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #321 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #12 of 39 Terre Haute, IN ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

330 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

72.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.7%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

8.2%

in the top 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

9.6 mi

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

5 mi

in the top 28% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Staunton, Indiana (ZIP 47881) sits in the bottom 45% nationally (17,540th) and the top 42% of Indiana (321st).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 7.9% nationally, modeled obesity lies in the top 7.0% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 14.6% nationally. Better still, walkability stands in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and modeled transportation noise rests at the national minimum. Floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 3.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 47803, about 2.2 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Terre Haute, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.4–34.8
High blood pressure among adults40.3%35.8–44.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%7.8–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.0–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.1–10.1
Depression among adults26.8%22.8–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.5–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%35.5–44.8
Obesity among adults43.7%35.4–51.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.0–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.7%13.9–20.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.4–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.0–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%76.8–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.1–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%62.0–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%59.5–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%68.9–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%13.7–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%14.0–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%20.8–30.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%31.3–43.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.1–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.6–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.4–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%12.6–17.4
Any disability among adults31.3%26.6–36.2
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Mobility disability among adults14.2%11.9–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.3–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.2–16.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%5.8–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.2–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.7–8.1
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.5–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.4–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)10.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)4.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)8.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription72.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate84.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households60.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+23.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age45.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$51,146$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$86,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$850$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.80 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured