Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47834

in Brazil, IndianaPopulation 18,625

45.67/ 100

Ranked #21,683 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #514 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #23 of 39 Terre Haute, IN ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.3%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US88th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Brazil, Indiana (ZIP 47834) comes out in the bottom 32% nationally (21,683rd) and the bottom 32% of Indiana (514th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 17% nationally, and pharmacy rests in the top 24% nationally. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 10.7% nationally, and obesity sits in the top 8.0% nationally. Modeled disaster risk settles in the top 12.2% nationally, and lead in tap water registers in the top 14.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic lands in the top 17% nationally.

In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 46135, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Terre Haute, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.4–35.9
High blood pressure among adults41.4%37.3–45.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.1
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Depression among adults26.8%23.1–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.5–16.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%36.9–45.3
Obesity among adults43.3%35.6–51.0
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%15.5–21.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%7.0–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.4–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.0–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%84.1–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%64.0–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.5%56.3–63.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%68.5–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.5%16.2–21.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.0%23.7–32.2
Short sleep duration among adults36.6%31.1–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.8%20.2–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.4–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.5–18.0
Any disability among adults34.3%30.2–38.4
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.1
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.0
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.2–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.5–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.8–17.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.2–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.8–8.6
Loneliness among adults33.6%29.0–38.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.1–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)10.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription87.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate80.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households51.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+19.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age43.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$68,578$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$157,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$896$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured