Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

26833

in Maysville, West VirginiaPopulation 2,890

43.09/ 100

Ranked #24,297 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #94 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 13.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

44.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.4%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70.4%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST25th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.42%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Park land

12.4%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.8%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

15.1%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

9.0%

in the top 30% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US70th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Maysville, West Virginia (ZIP 26833), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 24% nationally (24,297th) and the top 13.5% of West Virginia (94th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: homeownership registers in the top 7.0% nationally, modeled tree cover stands in the top 9.0% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Park land is in the top 10.1% nationally, housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 10.8% nationally, and childcare rests in the top 13.5% nationally. By contrast, modeled short sleep lies in the top 3.5% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes settles in the top 12.4% nationally, and modeled obesity registers in the top 10.9% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 26260, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.9; chronic-disease standing 15.6 — 74 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #805 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.0%34.2–41.9
High blood pressure among adults42.7%38.1–47.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.6–11.4
Depression among adults29.0%24.9–33.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.7–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.6%37.9–47.3
Obesity among adults42.5%34.0–51.4
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.4%17.7–25.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.3–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.0–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.1–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.4–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%62.5–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.7%50.7–58.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%67.9–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%11.7–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.0%16.3–22.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.5%26.5–37.2
Short sleep duration among adults44.7%37.5–52.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.3–26.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%18.0–22.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%14.8–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.5%15.4–19.9
Any disability among adults38.3%33.4–43.5
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.9
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Mobility disability among adults17.6%15.2–20.3
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.4–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.0–15.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.7–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.0–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Loneliness among adults33.0%28.0–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–6410.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription87.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate96.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households57.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age40.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$72,012$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$180,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 1.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.74 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured