Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47635

in Rockport, IndianaPopulation 5,362

43.85/ 100

Ranked #23,563 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #587 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.39 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

39.2%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

91.2 days/year

in the top 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

8.8 days/year

in the top 38% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US62nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

Rockport, Indiana (ZIP 47635), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 27% nationally (23,563rd) and the bottom 22% of Indiana (587th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 0.5% nationally, floodplain exposure rests in the top 6.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Better still, elder services lands in the top 3.4% nationally, and pharmacy resides in the top 3.7% nationally. Mental-health providers lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and outpatient settles in the top 5.9% nationally. Grocery stands in the top 7.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 47611, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.4%29.7–37.2
High blood pressure among adults42.5%38.0–47.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
Depression among adults26.8%23.0–30.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.5–16.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%37.2–46.4
Obesity among adults41.2%33.0–50.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.9%14.8–21.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.1–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.3–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.0–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.5–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%60.7–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.0%54.0–61.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%64.2–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.4–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%14.8–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.2–30.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%29.2–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.5–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.6–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.4–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.2–17.1
Any disability among adults33.9%29.2–38.6
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Mobility disability among adults16.3%14.0–18.6
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.5–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.9–15.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.5–9.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.2–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Loneliness among adults31.7%26.8–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)8.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription81.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate70.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households66.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age46.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$66,286$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$166,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$679$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 1.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.72 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured