Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43008

in Buckeye Lake, OhioPopulation 2,434

40.59/ 100

Ranked #26,334 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #949 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #109 of 127 Columbus, OH ZIPs (bottom 14.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

81%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

66%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

27.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.9%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.6%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.5%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

59.7%

in the bottom 13.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Buckeye Lake, Ohio (ZIP 43008) places in the bottom 18% nationally (26,334th) and the bottom 19% of Ohio (949th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled pfas sits in the top 1.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled arsenic rests in the top 3.7% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the top 7.4% nationally. Crowded housing is in the top 7.4% nationally. Fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 12.8% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 7.9% nationally, walkability settles in the top 11.4% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 13.3% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 43025, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbus, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.1–37.3
High blood pressure among adults38.1%34.3–42.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.8–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.2–11.8
Depression among adults27.6%24.0–31.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.6–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.3–43.6
Obesity among adults39.8%33.7–46.6
Stroke among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.9%21.0–29.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.0–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.5–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.4–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.4–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.7%54.8–64.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.4%55.7–62.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%64.6–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.4%15.8–23.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%22.6–32.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%33.9–45.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%17.5–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.3–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.7–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.3–18.2
Any disability among adults32.7%28.2–37.8
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.5
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.6–10.6
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.3–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.6–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.3–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.0–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%10.5–17.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.4%8.6–14.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.8–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.1–9.0
Loneliness among adults35.2%30.1–41.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.4–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6414.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)15.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate75.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age48.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$88,558$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$164,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$860$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.2 yr ± 1.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.74 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured