Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47611

in Chrisney, IndianaPopulation 988

46.28/ 100

Ranked #21,012 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #492 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

75.2%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

2.1%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

88.8 days/year

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Chrisney, Indiana (ZIP 47611) ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,012th) and the bottom 35% of Indiana (492nd).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 0.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation lands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians sits at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Childcare is at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. More encouragingly, crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband resides in the top 14.5% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle rests in the bottom 18% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 47537, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%28.8–36.0
High blood pressure among adults41.3%37.1–45.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.2–10.8
Depression among adults26.9%23.1–31.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.0–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%36.7–45.7
Obesity among adults40.6%32.4–49.1
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.6%12.7–18.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.0–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.7–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.3–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.2–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%62.1–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%57.8–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.7%64.3–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.7–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.0–20.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.2–30.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%28.2–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.4%18.3–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.9–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.2–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
Any disability among adults33.5%29.0–38.3
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.5–18.1
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.9–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.7–15.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.2–9.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.2–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.9
Loneliness among adults32.3%27.4–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–647.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)10.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription75.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate88.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households65.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+31.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age52.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$56,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$171,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$625$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured