Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47542

in Huntingburg, IndianaPopulation 10,350

46.29/ 100

Ranked #21,006 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #491 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.4 ppb

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 14.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US85th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Huntingburg, Indiana (ZIP 47542), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 34% nationally (21,006th) and the bottom 35% of Indiana (491st).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: fiber broadband registers in the top 12.0% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 12.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Dental providers lies in the top 14.0% nationally, and elder services settles in the top 15% nationally. Working the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 3.6% nationally, and lead in tap water is in the top 3.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity sits in the top 13.4% nationally, and transportation noise registers in the top 18% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 47523, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.7–33.8
High blood pressure among adults38.0%34.3–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Depression among adults24.2%21.0–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.3–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%36.2–44.3
Obesity among adults41.9%35.3–49.0
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%14.7–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.1%10.1–14.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.7–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.6–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.2–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%61.4–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.2%55.3–63.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%65.9–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.8–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.3–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.3%24.0–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%27.7–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.1%21.1–27.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.0–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.8–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.8–18.8
Any disability among adults33.7%29.7–38.1
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Mobility disability among adults16.3%14.2–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%21.3–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.4–19.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.4–12.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.8–14.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
Loneliness among adults33.4%28.8–38.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6412.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)15.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription88.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate74.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population11.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households58.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+14.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$77,574$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$198,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$881$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured