Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47469

in West Baden Springs, IndianaPopulation 1,567

44.24/ 100

Ranked #23,183 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #573 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.56 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

3.0%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.56 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

29.2%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

74.4%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.56 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.56 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.5%

in the bottom 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US13th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

10.5 mi

in the top 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43%

in the top 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, West Baden Springs, Indiana (ZIP 47469) comes out in the bottom 28% nationally (23,183rd) and the bottom 24% of Indiana (573rd).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: slow internet speeds sits in the top 3.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the top 11.8% nationally. On the brighter side, grocery registers in the top 1.2% nationally, pharmacy stands in the top 4.0% nationally, and park land lands in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled tree cover is in the top 7.2% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Childcare rests in the top 8.4% nationally, and civic lies in the top 10.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 47432, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.3%31.8–38.8
High blood pressure among adults42.8%38.7–46.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Depression among adults26.6%23.0–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.2–17.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%38.7–47.3
Obesity among adults39.9%32.6–47.6
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.2%13.2–19.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.2–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.5–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.3–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.4–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%61.0–71.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%54.4–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%64.8–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%16.7–22.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.5–33.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.3%32.0–46.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%20.7–27.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.4–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.4–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.4%14.6–18.5
Any disability among adults37.1%32.4–41.6
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.5–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%19.5–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.6–18.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.6–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.9
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.4–37.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6412.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)25.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate79.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households48.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$63,529$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$204,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$783$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured