Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47432

in French Lick, IndianaPopulation 4,809

45.10/ 100

Ranked #22,303 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #534 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

64.2%

in the top 12.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

42.9%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

39.2 mi

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Park land

3.7%

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, French Lick, Indiana (ZIP 47432) lands in the bottom 30% nationally (22,303rd) and the bottom 29% of Indiana (534th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled tree cover lies in the top 12.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband lands in the top 15% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 19% nationally, pharmacy rests in the top 21% nationally, and park land is in the top 21% nationally. Physicians stands in the top 22% nationally. On the other hand, modeled high cholesterol settles in the top 11.1% nationally. Childcare lies at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 47513, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 72.5; chronic-disease standing 19.1 — 53 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,231 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.9%31.7–38.1
High blood pressure among adults42.3%38.4–46.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.4–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%9.4–11.9
Depression among adults26.1%22.9–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%13.2–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.9%38.9–46.9
Obesity among adults39.3%32.5–46.6
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.9%13.3–18.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.2–10.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%78.0–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.8–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.9–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%60.0–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%54.8–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%65.6–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.7–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.6%16.2–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.3%24.3–32.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%31.6–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.7–26.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.3–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.3–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%14.4–17.9
Any disability among adults36.3%32.3–40.4
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.4–19.7
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.0–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.3–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.2–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.1–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Loneliness among adults32.4%28.0–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)12.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population3.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$65,723$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$111,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$845$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured