Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46807

in Fort Wayne, IndianaPopulation 16,317

42.53/ 100

Ranked #24,788 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #634 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #37 of 41 Fort Wayne, IN ZIPs (bottom 9.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

150 intersections/sq mi

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.0%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

13.8%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Park land

12.3%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

95.2%

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 46807, one of several in Fort Wayne, Indiana ranks in the bottom 23% nationally (24,788th) and the bottom 16% of Indiana (634th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: walkability registers in the top 5.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes lies in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Mental-health providers is in the top 8.7% nationally, and park land registers in the top 10.2% nationally. Fiber broadband lies in the top 10.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. On the other side, outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 8.9% nationally, modeled utility shutoff lies in the top 9.2% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 10.0% nationally. Modeled obesity registers in the top 7.5% nationally.

Against its neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 46809, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Fort Wayne, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.1%22.1–26.4
High blood pressure among adults36.2%33.5–39.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.8–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.6–9.4
Depression among adults27.8%25.0–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.4–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.5%30.8–36.4
Obesity among adults43.5%39.3–47.8
Stroke among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.5%17.2–23.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%11.0–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.2%70.6–75.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%74.6–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults81.7%79.7–83.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.0%57.7–66.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.0%52.9–59.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%65.5–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.8–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.1%16.0–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%24.0–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%33.5–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.3%22.0–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.1%18.1–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.8–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%16.8–20.6
Any disability among adults33.6%30.5–37.0
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Independent living disability among adults10.0%9.1–11.2
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.9–16.2
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%22.5–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.2%20.7–25.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.8–17.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.2–19.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.6–13.2
Loneliness among adults34.5%31.1–38.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.2–15.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6420.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription89.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate60.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population8.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households35.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+9.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age34.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$58,685$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$153,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,004$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured