Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37217

in Nashville, TennesseePopulation 31,869

43.61/ 100

Ranked #23,790 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #222 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #77 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

19.1%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

41.4%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.4%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

361 units

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Park land

17.9%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

35.4 per million

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

8.7%

in the top 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.4%

in the top 12.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

37.8%

in the top 12.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 37217, one of several in Nashville, Tennessee, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 26% nationally (23,790th) and the top 36% of Tennessee (222nd).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 6.6% nationally, and park land settles in the top 7.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers rests in the top 11.9% nationally. Against that, modeled uninsured settles in the top 5.3% nationally, and homeownership lands in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Crowded housing rests in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 8.9% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the top 9.8% nationally, and transportation noise rests in the top 10.8% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 37013, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.3 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $62,796 predicts 78.2 years — 2.9 years below.

    Ranked #4,013 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.3 ± 1.1 years. The 41 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.5 years — 2.2 years below them.

    Ranked #1,727 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 12.0; chronic-disease standing 72.2 — 60 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,439 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.7%22.2–27.3
High blood pressure among adults34.3%31.1–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Depression among adults27.9%24.6–31.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.6%30.2–37.0
Obesity among adults35.9%30.9–41.0
Stroke among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%15.2–21.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.1%16.9–21.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.8%67.7–73.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.4%69.8–76.7
Cholesterol screening among adults82.8%80.8–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.1%54.5–63.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.1%49.9–56.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%67.6–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%13.9–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.6–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%26.8–34.4
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%34.5–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.5%23.8–29.2
Frequent mental distress among adults21.2%19.0–23.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%17.8–21.9
Any disability among adults36.6%32.8–40.2
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Mobility disability among adults15.0%13.3–16.7
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Vision disability among adults6.8%6.2–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6429.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)18.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle6.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate41.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population31.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households38.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+11.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age33.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$62,796$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$317,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,384$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured