Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46809

in Fort Wayne, IndianaPopulation 8,589

43.55/ 100

Ranked #23,852 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #604 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #35 of 41 Fort Wayne, IN ZIPs (bottom 14.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.8%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.6%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.78 per 1,000 residents

in the top 14.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

4.1%

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 46809, one of several in Fort Wayne, Indiana places in the bottom 26% nationally (23,852nd) and the bottom 20% of Indiana (604th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Recreation settles in the top 14.5% nationally. Pulling the other way, PFAS in drinking water sits at the national maximum, modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 8.5% nationally, and modeled transportation noise rests in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 9.5% nationally, modeled obesity is in the top 11.3% nationally, and households without a vehicle lands in the top 14.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas registers in the top 16% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 46783, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Fort Wayne, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.5 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.2 years — 3.1 years below them.

    Ranked #2,419 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.7–31.6
High blood pressure among adults40.0%37.1–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Depression among adults27.7%24.9–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%13.3–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.2–40.2
Obesity among adults42.4%38.2–46.6
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.7–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.6–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%75.3–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.7–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.8–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%62.6–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.5%54.4–60.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%66.4–78.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%14.4–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.6–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%23.0–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%32.0–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.3%21.0–25.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%17.2–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.4–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.6–19.1
Any disability among adults34.4%31.3–37.7
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.7–10.7
Mobility disability among adults16.0%14.3–17.8
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%21.2–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.1%15.9–20.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.0–13.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.7–15.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.4–10.6
Loneliness among adults33.0%29.7–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.5–12.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6411.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle10.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate62.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households58.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age40.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$52,253$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$133,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$888$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured