Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46721

in Butler, IndianaPopulation 4,739

42.61/ 100

Ranked #24,725 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #632 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

18.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.6%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Radon

3 pCi/L

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Butler, Indiana (ZIP 46721) lands in the bottom 23% nationally (24,725th) and the bottom 17% of Indiana (632nd).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: grocery rests in the top 7.1% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled transportation noise lies in the top 3.0% nationally, mammography lands in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and obesity sits in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled radon is in the top 11.0% nationally, industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 10.9% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 13.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 43518, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%26.7–33.4
High blood pressure among adults39.2%34.9–43.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Depression among adults27.6%23.6–31.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.9–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.7–43.1
Obesity among adults45.6%37.7–53.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%14.9–21.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.4–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.2–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.2–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.3–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%58.4–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%54.4–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.4%57.6–74.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.0–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.5%16.8–22.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.3%23.8–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.5%32.2–45.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%20.3–26.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.2–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
Any disability among adults33.3%28.9–38.0
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.5–17.9
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%21.1–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.0–18.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.9–11.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.8–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Loneliness among adults33.8%28.8–38.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)11.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription81.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate83.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households55.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age43.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$68,580$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$138,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$804$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured