Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46506

in Bremen, IndianaPopulation 9,994

41.48/ 100

Ranked #25,684 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #665 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 12.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

37%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

23.8%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.1%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

11.5%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bremen, Indiana (ZIP 46506), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 20% nationally (25,684th) and the bottom 12.2% of Indiana (665th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled arsenic lies in the top 2.0% nationally, and tooth loss registers in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled energy burden is in the top 7.8% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 10.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers in the top 11.8% nationally, and modeled obesity is in the top 11.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 46504, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%27.7–33.4
High blood pressure among adults39.3%35.8–43.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.1–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.3–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Depression among adults26.7%23.7–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.3–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%37.1–44.4
Obesity among adults42.4%36.3–49.0
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.8%20.4–27.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.7–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%76.3–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.9–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.7–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%60.3–68.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.3%56.0–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%65.1–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.8–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.2%15.9–20.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.7%25.6–33.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%31.6–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.1%21.3–27.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%17.0–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%14.0–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.2–18.9
Any disability among adults34.7%30.8–38.7
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.5–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%21.2–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.1–19.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.0–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.4–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Loneliness among adults34.3%29.8–39.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.4–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6422.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)20.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle11.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription81.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate78.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population5.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households56.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+16.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$79,386$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$242,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$948$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured