Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46501

in Argos, IndianaPopulation 3,780

39.40/ 100

Ranked #27,141 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #695 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 8.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

30.4%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.5%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.1%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

70%

in the bottom 14.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

62.5%

in the bottom 25% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Argos, Indiana (ZIP 46501), overall, ranks in the bottom 15% nationally (27,141st) and the bottom 8.2% of Indiana (695th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: fiber broadband lands in the top 5.8% nationally, housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the bottom 11.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic rests in the top 3.1% nationally, obesity registers in the top 4.6% nationally, and energy burden resides in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the top 10.0% nationally, and loud transportation noise is in the top 15% nationally. Modeled mammography sits in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 46504, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.4%28.3–34.8
High blood pressure among adults40.6%36.8–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Depression among adults27.8%24.2–31.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.6–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%36.9–45.1
Obesity among adults44.9%38.1–52.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.1%15.7–22.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.2–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.7–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.3–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults84.1%82.0–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%57.4–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.7%51.9–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%61.6–77.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%18.0–24.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%26.1–35.4
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%33.1–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.7%21.6–28.2
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%18.0–22.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.6–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.7–20.1
Any disability among adults35.3%31.0–40.0
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.3
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.8–19.4
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%21.3–29.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.4–20.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.8–12.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.4–14.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–10.3
Loneliness among adults34.3%29.4–39.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6420.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)15.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription85.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate80.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households51.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+14.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$64,172$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$156,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$949$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 1.5378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.53 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured