Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46376

in Schneider, IndianaPopulation 319

52.30/ 100

Ranked #13,046 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #171 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #262 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

98.2%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

4.6%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

130 µg/L

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

20.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.2%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US7th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.1%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.4%

in the bottom 12.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

13.7 mi

in the top 13.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

The read

Schneider, Indiana (ZIP 46376), on the composite measure, lands in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,046th) and the top 23% of Indiana (171st).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Poverty lands in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Working the other way, floodplain exposure resides in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 1.6% nationally. Lithium in drinking water settles in the top 1.7% nationally, and unemployment stands in the top 1.9% nationally. Modeled transportation noise is in the top 6.2% nationally, and binge drinking rests in the top 6.2% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 46356, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%26.1–31.2
High blood pressure among adults34.6%31.6–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Depression among adults22.7%20.1–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.6–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%32.8–38.6
Obesity among adults35.0%31.0–39.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%10.3–14.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.7–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%74.9–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%76.1–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.1–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%68.3–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%61.4–66.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.4%75.0–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%17.4–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.1–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.9%17.8–23.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%36.8–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%14.8–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.7–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.8–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.2–14.5
Any disability among adults26.5%23.3–29.7
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.6
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.6–14.1
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%20.0–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.0–11.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.8–5.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Loneliness among adults29.9%26.8–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–642.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)20.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription84.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate85.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households48.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age47.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$64,205$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$187,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,125$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured