Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46368

in Portage, IndianaPopulation 40,301

47.10/ 100

Ranked #20,049 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #439 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #313 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

83.5%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

420 units

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

16.9%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Park land

8.0%

in the top 13.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

Portage, Indiana (ZIP 46368), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 37% nationally (20,049th) and the bottom 42% of Indiana (439th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 5.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Park land resides in the top 13.8% nationally. By contrast, modeled pfas rests in the top 1.2% nationally, and expected annual loss lies in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 7.6% nationally, and arsenic settles in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 11.8% nationally, and obesity stands in the top 11.3% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 46304, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.6 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $76,368 predicts 79.0 years — 3.5 years below.

    Ranked #4,646 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%26.3–31.8
High blood pressure among adults39.6%36.2–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%7.0–8.4
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.2–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Depression among adults24.0%21.0–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%35.3–42.4
Obesity among adults42.4%37.2–48.0
Stroke among adults3.5%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.1%13.3–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%9.2–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%72.8–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.1–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%84.0–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%58.7–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.3%55.9–62.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%66.4–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.7–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%14.8–19.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%25.7–33.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%34.6–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.8–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.3–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.2–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%14.0–17.4
Any disability among adults32.3%28.9–35.9
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Mobility disability among adults15.0%13.3–16.8
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%21.2–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.8–19.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.3–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.7–15.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Loneliness among adults32.9%29.0–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.3–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–648.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)7.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate73.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population4.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households49.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+16.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$76,368$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$227,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,241$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured