Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46301

in Beverly Shores, IndianaPopulation 650

53.02/ 100

Ranked #12,045 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #142 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #252 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

49.5%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.6%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.9%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

50.9%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.4%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.8%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Park land

39.2%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

50%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

26.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Beverly Shores, Indiana (ZIP 46301) places in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,045th) and the top 19% of Indiana (142nd).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and housing insecurity lies in the bottom 2.4% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and binge drinking resides in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Park land is in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 4.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled high cholesterol stands in the top 0.4% nationally, modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 2.6% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled arsenic sits in the top 4.1% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 46304, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.2%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.8%37.8–45.9
High blood pressure among adults50.9%46.6–55.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.4%12.9–15.9
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.0–12.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%7.9–12.5
Depression among adults20.8%18.0–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.9%14.2–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened49.5%45.3–53.7
Obesity among adults38.1%32.8–43.7
Stroke among adults4.8%4.0–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.2%9.1–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%3.7–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.6%83.0–87.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.6%84.3–88.6
Cholesterol screening among adults93.6%92.4–94.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.9%70.8–78.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.9%66.9–72.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%69.7–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.8%9.0–12.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%9.4–16.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%21.2–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%27.8–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%16.0–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults12.7%10.8–14.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%12.7–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.8%8.8–13.2
Any disability among adults32.8%27.7–38.5
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.1–12.2
Independent living disability among adults7.1%5.7–8.8
Mobility disability among adults18.1%14.6–22.1
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.1–4.8
Vision disability among adults4.7%3.8–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.6%15.3–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.0–11.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.3%2.9–6.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.5–7.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.5–5.5
Loneliness among adults26.6%22.7–30.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.5–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)0.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)74.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription96.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate96.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households86.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+54.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age66.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$119,948$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$606,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,675$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.1 yr ± 1.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.52 years of 82.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured