ZIP code
21671
in Tilghman, MarylandPopulation 727
55.65/ 100
Ranked #8,681 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)
Ranked #282 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 38%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
47.6%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
52.7%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
77.1%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Civic-institution access
1.3 per 1,000 residents
in the top 2.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
50.9%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
14.0%
in the top 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Recreation access
1.3 per 1,000 residents
in the top 5.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Mammography
82.3%
in the top 3.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST83rdUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
14.1 mi
in the top 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
4.9%
in the bottom 6.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST18thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Tilghman, Maryland (ZIP 21671) sits in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,681st) and the bottom 38% of Maryland (282nd).
The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled colon screening settles in the top 1.0% nationally, civic stands in the top 2.6% nationally, and recreation is in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the top 3.4% nationally, and transportation sits in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled high cholesterol registers in the top 1.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 2.3% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides in the top 3.8% nationally, and unemployment lies in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles in the top 6.0% nationally.
In plain language, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 21665, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 79%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 91%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 90%
8%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 54%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 17%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 9%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 31%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 75%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 98%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 83%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 77%
8%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 40%
16%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 6%
21%
Disability
healthier than 20%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 4%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 23%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
21665
Marylandshares a border
Score 56.10
Closest healthier
21612
Marylandabout 1.1 mi away
Score 60.21
Similar health profile
31527
Georgia98% similar profile
Score 58.52
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 38.1% | 34.4–41.9 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 45.7% | 41.6–49.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 14.8% | 13.2–16.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.1% | 9.0–11.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.9% | 8.4–11.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.6% | 7.4–12.2 |
| Depression among adults | 20.5% | 17.7–23.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.4% | 12.2–16.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 47.6% | 43.8–51.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 29.5% | 24.7–34.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.7% | 3.9–5.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 9.1% | 7.4–11.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.3% | 4.3–8.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 84.3% | 81.6–86.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.4% | 81.7–86.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 93.3% | 91.9–94.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 77.1% | 73.0–80.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 71.4% | 68.4–74.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 82.3% | 76.8–86.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.1% | 10.9–15.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.0% | 8.8–15.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 24.4% | 19.4–30.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.8% | 25.5–34.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.2% | 15.2–23.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 12.7% | 10.8–14.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.9% | 12.4–17.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.1% | 9.0–13.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 31.4% | 26.4–37.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.2% | 8.7–11.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.3% | 5.8–9.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.8% | 13.5–20.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.1–4.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.6–5.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.2% | 15.9–22.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.2% | 6.5–12.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 5.2–10.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 5.5–9.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.9% | 3.9–6.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.3% | 24.9–34.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.5% | 3.6–5.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MD median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 13.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 4.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 4.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 6.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 24.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 37.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 14.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457 |
| Broadband subscription | 86.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 52.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457 |
| Homeownership rate | 90.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 82.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 6.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464 |
| Single-parent households | 74.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450 |
| Population 65+ | 31.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464 |
| Median age | 56.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460 |
| Median household income | $45,125 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419 |
| Median home value | $294,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MD median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.9 yr ± 0.93 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured