Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46182

in Waldron, IndianaPopulation 1,803

49.42/ 100

Ranked #17,039 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #304 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #81 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

61 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.5%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Waldron, Indiana (ZIP 46182) lands in the bottom 47% nationally (17,039th) and the top 40% of Indiana (304th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Homeownership lands in the top 13.6% nationally, and modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled colon screening sits in the top 17% nationally. Against that, fatal road crashes rests in the top 2.1% nationally, and modeled arsenic is in the top 9.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation settles at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise resides in the top 19% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 47240, about 1.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%29.1–36.0
High blood pressure among adults40.6%36.5–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%7.0–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%8.0–10.2
Depression among adults26.5%23.0–30.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.8–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%36.8–45.4
Obesity among adults39.8%32.7–47.2
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.3–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%6.0–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.6–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.5–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.6–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%66.4–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%58.2–65.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%67.8–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.1–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.7–19.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.9%21.1–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%29.1–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.3%17.9–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.6–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.1–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%13.2–16.7
Any disability among adults32.6%28.7–37.1
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.2
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.2–9.1
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.6–17.8
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.1–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%19.0–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.7–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.3–7.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.5–7.1
Loneliness among adults32.0%27.7–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.7–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–646.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)4.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate91.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households68.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+22.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age53.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$89,567$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$254,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,600$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured