Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48145

in La Salle, MichiganPopulation 2,904

51.65/ 100

Ranked #13,897 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #418 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #9 of 17 Monroe, MI ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

44.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

71.4%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, La Salle, Michigan (ZIP 48145) lands in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,897th) and the top 43% of Michigan (418th).

continue reading

The profile opens on a set of genuinely favorable readings: modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 10.4% nationally, and housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 21% nationally. Modeled colon screening sits in the top 20% nationally. On the other side, fatal road crashes rests in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 9.0% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas settles in the top 18% nationally. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Childcare resides at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 22% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 48140, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Monroe, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%29.9–36.6
High blood pressure among adults37.4%33.6–41.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.2
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.4–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.3–10.0
Depression among adults26.5%23.0–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.5–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%35.0–42.8
Obesity among adults39.7%33.8–46.1
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%9.0–13.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.8–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%75.7–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.6–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.4%86.7–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%66.0–74.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.9%68.9–74.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%64.1–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.6–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.2–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%19.7–27.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%29.4–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%15.8–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.3–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.6–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.0–15.7
Any disability among adults31.5%27.4–35.8
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.4–16.9
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.3–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.3–13.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.4–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.5–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.6–7.6
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.8–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–645.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription82.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate83.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households63.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+21.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age49.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$83,204$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$231,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,032$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured