ZIP code
46113
in Camby, IndianaPopulation 17,192
55.34/ 100
Ranked #9,042 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)
Ranked #73 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 9.7%)
Ranked #37 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (top 32%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Binge drinking
19.6%
in the top 7.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Stroke
2.6%
in the bottom 8.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
5.5%
in the bottom 11.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS11thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
5.1%
in the bottom 10.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS11thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Outer-floodplain exposure
2.5%
in the top 12.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS87thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
10.7%
in the bottom 12.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS12thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
2.8%
in the bottom 12.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS12thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
6.8%
in the bottom 18% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS18thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
3.8%
in the bottom 15% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS15thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
10.1%
in the bottom 17% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS17thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›The read
Camby, Indiana (ZIP 46113), by its composite score, sits in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,042nd) and the top 9.7% of Indiana (73rd).
Where the data is kindest to this area, a few readings lead the way: modeled stroke lands in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and hearing disability stands in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 10.9% nationally, and mobility disability settles in the bottom 12.5% nationally. Modeled self-care disability sits in the bottom 12.0% nationally. On the other hand, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 7.9% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 12.7% nationally, and lead in tap water resides in the top 13.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas lands in the top 16% nationally.
Next to the surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 46168, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 77%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 74%
16%
Disability
healthier than 83%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 70%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 83%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 51%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 43%
11%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 23%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 95%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 80%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 72%
14%
Disability
healthier than 93%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 72%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 82%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 57%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 45%
8%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 31%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 83%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 90%
14%
Disability
healthier than 75%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 83%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 68%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 53%
16%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 22%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 31%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
46158
Indianashares a border
Score 51.14
Closest healthier
46168
Indianashares a border
Score 56.05
Similar health profile
43040
Ohio96% similar profile
Score 55.33
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 24.1% | 22.5–25.9 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 33.0% | 31.0–35.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.1% | 6.7–7.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.3% | 10.4–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.1% | 4.6–5.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.2% | 5.6–6.9 |
| Depression among adults | 26.2% | 24.2–28.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.1% | 9.2–11.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.3% | 32.2–36.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.0% | 32.9–39.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.6% | 2.5–2.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.8% | 13.0–16.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.5% | 6.6–8.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 73.5% | 71.5–75.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.3% | 75.4–79.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.7% | 84.4–87.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.4% | 62.7–68.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 63.5% | 61.3–65.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 76.8% | 72.8–80.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 19.6% | 17.8–21.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.2% | 12.6–15.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 20.2% | 18.1–22.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.9% | 34.0–40.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.5% | 15.0–18.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.9% | 16.5–19.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.2% | 11.2–13.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.1% | 12.9–15.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.3% | 24.1–28.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.5% | 5.0–6.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.8% | 6.2–7.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 10.7% | 9.7–11.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.8% | 2.6–3.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.8% | 3.5–4.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.7% | 20.6–24.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.7% | 10.2–13.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 6.2% | 5.3–7.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.1% | 8.9–11.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.6% | 5.9–7.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.6% | 31.0–36.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 6.5–8.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 5.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 9.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 8.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 6.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 23.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | 93.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | 74.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.6% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 9.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767 |
| Single-parent households | 42.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756 |
| Population 65+ | 11.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767 |
| Median age | 34.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756 |
| Median household income | $84,463 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721 |
| Median home value | $248,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724 |
| Median gross rent | $1,476 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $925 ($704–$1,261) n=640 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.1 yr ± 1.04 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured