Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45769

in Pomeroy, OhioPopulation 5,395

36.38/ 100

Ranked #28,819 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.2%)

Ranked #1,061 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 9.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

72%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.2%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.8%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

16.8%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

44.5%

in the top 13.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pomeroy, Ohio (ZIP 45769) ranks in the bottom 10.2% nationally (28,819th) and the bottom 9.8% of Ohio (1,061st).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: pharmacy sits in the top 5.0% nationally, and mental-health providers resides in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled tree cover stands in the top 8.2% nationally, and elder services sits in the top 8.8% nationally. Grocery resides in the top 9.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 6.7% nationally, coronary heart disease resides in the top 8.3% nationally, and obesity stands in the top 6.7% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Against its neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 45710, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.4%33.0–39.8
High blood pressure among adults44.5%40.6–48.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults10.2%9.1–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.8%11.3–14.3
Depression among adults27.8%24.2–31.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.8%14.9–19.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%36.8–44.7
Obesity among adults43.8%37.2–50.4
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%15.9–22.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.0–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.4–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.6–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.5–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.3%58.5–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.3%52.6–59.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%64.4–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.8–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.0%19.1–25.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.7%33.9–43.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%33.7–46.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%23.8–30.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.4%18.2–22.7
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%16.3–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.7–19.8
Any disability among adults37.4%33.2–41.8
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Independent living disability among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Mobility disability among adults19.9%17.5–22.4
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%18.8–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.3%15.6–21.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.2–20.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.1–15.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.4–10.8
Loneliness among adults34.8%30.0–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.8–11.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)16.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle6.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription78.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate75.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age45.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$50,952$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$113,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$684$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 1.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.57 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured