ZIP code
45433
in Dayton, OhioPopulation 1,508
54.14/ 100
Ranked #10,523 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)
Ranked #211 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 18%)
Ranked #17 of 57 Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH ZIPs (top 30%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
23.7%
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
2.5%
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
21.4%
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
2.6%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
22.9%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Stroke
1.4%
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
3.1%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
21.8%
in the top 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
5.7%
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
In this ZIP
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›The read
ZIP 45433, one of several in Dayton, Ohio, by its overall standing, sits in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,523rd) and the top 18% of Ohio (211th).
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled high cholesterol rests in the bottom 1.2% nationally, coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the bottom 1.2% nationally, hearing disability registers in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Set against that, homeownership lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and slow internet speeds is in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled binge drinking resides in the top 2.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum.
Held up against its neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 45434, about 2.4 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Disability
healthier than 95%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 59%
16%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 58%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 30%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 34%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 10%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 5%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.6%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 64%
11%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 52%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 55%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 18%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.4%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.00%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 88%
14%
Disability
healthier than 98%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 43%
16%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 4%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 39%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 11%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 30.1; chronic-disease standing 98.0 (top 10%) — 68 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #16,208 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
45324
Ohioshares a border
Score 48.84
Closest healthier
45434
Ohioabout 2.4 mi away
Score 63.07
Similar health profile
23665
Virginia99% similar profile
Score 56.02
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 14.4% | 12.6–16.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 21.4% | 18.6–24.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 3.3% | 3.0–3.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.2% | 9.9–12.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 2.5% | 2.3–2.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.4% | 2.9–3.9 |
| Depression among adults | 26.7% | 23.1–30.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 5.7% | 4.9–6.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 23.7% | 20.8–26.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.1% | 30.1–42.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.4% | 1.3–1.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 10.7% | 8.6–12.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.3% | 5.9–8.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 59.4% | 56.1–62.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 72.9% | 68.7–76.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 78.4% | 75.3–81.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 60.2% | 55.2–65.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 61.7% | 58.3–65.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.4% | 66.3–79.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 21.8% | 18.3–25.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 10.7% | 8.7–12.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 18.5% | 15.1–22.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.1% | 34.8–45.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 12.7% | 10.7–14.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.4% | 17.7–23.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 9.4% | 8.0–10.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.1% | 12.8–17.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 22.3% | 18.5–26.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 3.1% | 2.7–3.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.5% | 5.6–7.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 5.7% | 4.9–6.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.0% | 1.8–2.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.2% | 2.8–3.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.4% | 19.0–26.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 10.0–15.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.5% | 6.9–10.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.5% | 9.6–13.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 7.1–9.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 39.3% | 34.3–45.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.9% | 6.6–9.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 7.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 4.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 37.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 10.8% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 20.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177 |
| Homeownership rate | 2.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.6% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180 |
| Single-parent households | 34.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168 |
| Population 65+ | 1.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180 |
| Median age | 25.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169 |
| Median household income | $89,615 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117 |
| Median gross rent | $1,422 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.5 yr ± 1.38 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured