Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44256

in Medina, OhioPopulation 64,924

58.03/ 100

Ranked #6,371 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #111 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 9.5%)

Ranked #29 of 113 Cleveland, OH ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

498 units

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

55.7%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.7%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.3%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US87th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

11.5%

in the bottom 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.4%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

84.1%

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.8%

in the bottom 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Medina, Ohio (ZIP 44256) ranks in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,371st) and the top 9.5% of Ohio (111th).

continue reading

Several of the strongest readings define how this area looks: subsidized affordable housing is in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 11.0% nationally, and transportation is in the bottom 11.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled pfas lies in the top 10.0% nationally, modeled arsenic is in the top 10.4% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water registers in the top 11.1% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the top 12.6% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the top 12.6% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 44233, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cleveland, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%27.1–33.4
High blood pressure among adults36.4%32.7–40.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Depression among adults23.9%20.8–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.0–42.1
Obesity among adults36.1%29.9–42.6
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%7.8–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%5.0–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.3–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.4–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.4%87.0–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%63.8–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.0%67.0–73.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%68.9–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.6–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%11.0–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%19.9–27.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%28.8–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.7–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.0–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%11.0–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%10.3–12.8
Any disability among adults25.0%21.9–28.6
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.4%10.1–13.0
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%16.3–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–7.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Loneliness among adults32.3%27.6–37.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households56.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+21.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age45.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$99,923$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$316,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,191$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.42 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured