Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45389

in Christiansburg, OhioPopulation 708

50.01/ 100

Ranked #16,239 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #430 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

250 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.21%

in the bottom 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.51%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

7 mi

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Christiansburg, Ohio (ZIP 45389), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 49% nationally (16,239th) and the top 37% of Ohio (430th).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled short sleep rests in the top 12.7% nationally, and obesity resides in the top 11.3% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. On the stronger side, walkability lands in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 10.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing lies at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure rests in the bottom 17% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 45312, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.7–34.3
High blood pressure among adults36.6%32.7–40.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.0–9.4
Depression among adults26.2%22.7–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.2–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.0–40.2
Obesity among adults42.4%34.6–50.4
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.5–17.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%5.9–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.2–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.7–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.0–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%60.7–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.4%60.9–67.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%70.8–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.0–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.2–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%22.4–31.8
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%34.3–47.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.3–21.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.1–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.4–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.4–16.6
Any disability among adults30.7%26.5–35.0
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Independent living disability among adults8.1%6.9–9.3
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.9–16.1
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.2–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.2–14.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.2–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.0–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–7.9
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.3–41.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.8–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–647.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)10.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription81.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households39.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+12.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$62,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$128,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$979$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.3178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.31 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured