Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43009

in Cable, OhioPopulation 2,229

50.24/ 100

Ranked #15,902 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #417 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4 pCi/L

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.1%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.2%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.18%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

92.7%

in the top 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$102,841

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Cable, Ohio (ZIP 43009) ranks in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,902nd) and the top 35% of Ohio (417th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: poverty stands in the bottom 7.1% nationally, and modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 11.5% nationally, homeownership sits in the top 12.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 17% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon stands in the top 2.1% nationally, short sleep sits in the top 8.6% nationally, and obesity resides in the top 11.7% nationally. Modeled arsenic stands in the top 17% nationally.

For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 43357, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%27.1–34.1
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.2–40.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%5.9–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.5–8.9
Depression among adults25.1%21.7–28.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.1–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%33.1–41.3
Obesity among adults42.3%34.6–50.3
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.2%16.7–24.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.5–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.3–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.9–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.3–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.6%60.7–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.4%57.7–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.4–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.5–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.1–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%20.8–30.1
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%35.4–49.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.2%14.6–20.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.9–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.6–15.3
Any disability among adults28.0%24.0–32.7
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.2
Mobility disability among adults12.7%10.7–14.9
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.5–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.3–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.3–9.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.3–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Loneliness among adults34.0%28.9–39.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–646.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)10.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate92.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+9.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$102,841$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$258,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,263$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured