ZIP code
45219
in Cincinnati, OhioPopulation 20,012
41.30/ 100
Ranked #25,807 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)
Ranked #922 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 22%)
Ranked #128 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (bottom 18%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
20.4%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
24.2%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
31%
in the top 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
22.4%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
42.6%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
57.2%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
17.1%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
47.8%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Physician access
4 per 1,000 residents
in the top 2.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.3%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, ZIP 45219, one of several in Cincinnati, Ohio stands in the bottom 20% nationally (25,807th) and the bottom 22% of Ohio (922nd).
Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 1.5% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the top 1.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the top 1.5% nationally. Homeownership rests in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and poverty lands in the top 1.8% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 1.0% nationally, modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and physicians lands in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 1.8% nationally.
Set beside the wider area around it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 45202, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 94%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 86%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 91%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 8%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 13%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 11%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.4%
8%
Disability
healthier than 35%
7%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 90%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 91%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 6%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 26%
14%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.7%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 21%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.5%
8%
Disability
healthier than 23%
7%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 97%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.00%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 90%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 4%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 32%
14%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.00%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 17%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 13.6; chronic-disease standing 93.8 (top 10%) — 80 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #17,206 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
45202
Ohioshares a border
Score 60.43
Closest healthier
45206
Ohioshares a border
Score 52.22
Similar health profile
47306
Indiana98% similar profile
Score 40.10
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 12.5% | 11.3–13.9 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 22.4% | 20.2–24.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 2.1% | 1.9–2.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.9% | 11.5–14.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.3% | 2.9–3.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.7% | 5.0–6.4 |
| Depression among adults | 33.5% | 30.2–37.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 7.0% | 6.3–7.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 20.4% | 18.4–22.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 33.8% | 29.8–38.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.9% | 1.8–2.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 31.0% | 27.1–34.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.7% | 8.9–12.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 52.9% | 50.5–55.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 71.6% | 68.1–75.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 64.4% | 61.0–68.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 58.2% | 54.3–62.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 48.1% | 44.9–51.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.2% | 68.2–79.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 20.3% | 17.5–23.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.3% | 13.1–17.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 27.0% | 23.6–30.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.8% | 36.8–44.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 22.2% | 19.6–25.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 27.6% | 24.8–30.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.0% | 10.5–13.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 24.2% | 21.4–27.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 34.3% | 30.5–38.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.1% | 3.6–4.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.5% | 11.8–15.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 8.4% | 7.5–9.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.3–4.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.0% | 6.3–7.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.8% | 20.4–27.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 29.1% | 25.2–33.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 27.5% | 23.7–31.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.9% | 16.3–21.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 18.5% | 16.1–21.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 42.6% | 37.8–47.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 15.7% | 13.7–17.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 47.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 6.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 10.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 45.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171 |
| Households without a vehicle | 16.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177 |
| Broadband subscription | 92.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 57.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177 |
| Homeownership rate | 17.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177 |
| Foreign-born population | 8.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180 |
| Single-parent households | 35.1% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168 |
| Population 65+ | 5.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180 |
| Median age | 21.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169 |
| Median household income | $35,657 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127 |
| Median home value | $207,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117 |
| Median gross rent | $1,258 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured